The idea of loyalty in football is romantic, familiar and endlessly repeated, yet the modern game keeps proving that managers and players operate in a world shaped by careers, contracts and opportunities, not emotional allegiance.
Supporters often speak of loyalty as if it were a sacred code that everyone in the sport must follow.
For fans, the attachment to a club becomes a lifelong commitment. It is ritual, identity and belonging. The badge represents family, history and a sense of place. Many supporters follow their club like a religion, shaped by memories, emotion and community.
The expectation is that players and managers should feel the same. The reality could not be further from the truth.
Very snake like message. How can anyone trust him. https://t.co/MUf3NN8x5l
— Harry 🏴 (@Postecogniac) November 12, 2025
The Edwards Debate Proves The Point
The recent move involving Rob Edwards is a clear example. His decision to leave Middlesbrough for Wolves drew predictable accusations of disloyalty. Yet it revealed the fundamental truth that loyalty is rarely symmetrical.
Edwards was criticised by the Boro support, who felt abandoned only a few months into his tenure. However, the move made perfect sense for him. Wolves is his club. He played there, his identity is connected to the fanbase and he has a personal history that stretches back decades. By leaving Middlesbrough, he was not showing a lack of loyalty. He was showing loyalty to something else.
Supporters often believe loyalty means staying regardless of opportunities or personal ambition. For professionals, loyalty manifests in different ways. It may be loyalty to a formative club, a mentor, a career path or a family decision. It is rarely the badge they are currently being paid to represent. Expecting anything else is unrealistic.
Núñez And The Rivalry Myth
The move of Marcelino Núñez from Norwich City to Ipswich Town created similar outrage. Crossing that divide is seen by supporters as an act of betrayal. Yet for the player, it was a footballing decision. His job is to progress, earn better terms and secure the best environment for his development.
Players do not experience rivalry in the same way as supporters. They are not raised in the tribal traditions of a derby. They have not lived the emotional weight of it. To Núñez, the move was simple. To Norwich fans, it was unthinkable. The disconnect shows the extent to which loyalty exists more in the minds of supporters than in the reality of the sport.
The anger that followed ignored the basic fact that players are transient workers. They do not choose where they are born, but they do choose the best professional opportunities available to them. Rivalries mean everything to fans and almost nothing to most players unless they grew up within the club themselves.
Supporters Expect Loyalty They Do Not Give
There is also hypocrisy within fan reaction. Many supporters will demand loyalty from players while offering little of it themselves. They will cheer a striker in a game and abuse him the next if his form dips. Managers can become heroes and villains within the span of a fortnight. Players see this.
They understand the rhythm of the sport and the nature of public judgement. If loyalty is conditional for supporters, why should it be unconditional for professionals whose livelihoods depend on performance and opportunity?
This was Trent Alexander-Arnold less than 24-hours ago, emotionally paying tribute to Diogo Jota and Andre Silva. Today, one of Liverpool’s biggest accounts on X calls Trent a rat 🐀
Some things are bigger than football. https://t.co/M9R7cOslPx pic.twitter.com/UD9yfquHZA
— Lea (@Lea_EFC) November 4, 2025
The Trent Alexander-Arnold Example Shows How Absurd It Has Become
Perhaps the most striking recent case is the reaction to Trent Alexander-Arnold, who was booed by sections of the crowd purely because he was playing against Liverpool. The idea that a player who has given everything for a club should be treated with hostility simply for representing his new team demonstrates how detached parts of the fanbase have become from any sense of proportion.
It is utterly absurd. Footballers are employees. They play where they are selected. They wear the shirt required of them. To boo a player for doing his job is not loyalty. It is immaturity. It reflects a fan culture that has confused emotional investment with entitlement.
View this post on Instagram
Football Loyalty Is A One-Way Fantasy
The truth is simple. Supporters love their clubs unconditionally. Players and managers do not and cannot. They move for better opportunities, for financial security, for family reasons or for career ambition. They are not betraying anyone. They are making perfectly rational decisions. Loyalty still exists, but it follows personal histories and emotional connections, not the last contract signed.
Fans can still love their club with passion and pride. That is the heart of football and always will be. But demanding the same from players and managers is unrealistic. The sport does not work that way. It never has. Loyalty in football, at least in the way fans imagine it, is a myth.
The sooner the game accepts it, the healthier the culture surrounding it will become.
